Decision 16436
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16436 | Jerome | English | 1989-04-24 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | vacation pay | by reason of lay-off or separation |
Summary:
Claimant argues that he received his vacation pay 4 days before he retired, so it was not paid in respect of termination. But it was clearly paid in contemplation of his termination under the collective agreement. Vacation pay is to be allocated under 58(13)(b).