Decision 16683
Full Text of Decision 16683
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Summary:
The Board accepted the claimant's evidence of a broadened job search area and allowed UI as of the date of the hearing. Decision reached without regard for the material before Board. The Board was under a duty to consider just when the broadened job search had begun.
Decision 15225
Full Text of Decision 15225
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Summary:
Job search list received by Commission 27-1. The Commission then considered that claimant had met 14(a) starting 25-1. Since the list was accepted, claimant must be considered available for the period to which the list relates, which is from 1-1.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
wages or salary |
|
Decision 15152
Full Text of Decision 15152
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Summary:
Teacher who gave birth to a child 19-5 and held not available from September. However during October and subsequently her searches were more than adequate. It appears clear that as of the hearing on 6-11, the Board should have lifted the disentitlement.Terminated 6-11.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
leave commencing prior to summer months |
|
|
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
maternity leave |
|
Decision 14876
Full Text of Decision 14876
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Summary:
The Commission quashed the disentitlement effective 26-9. There is nothing to indicate why it chose the 26-9 date. If it was based on the job search list, then one has to ask why the Commission did not take account of the earlier job searches as well. [p. 6]
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
right to be heard |
improper hearing |
|
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
contradictory |
|
| availability for work |
restrictions |
or preferences |
|
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
clarification |
|
Decision 14215
Full Text of Decision 14215
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Summary:
Since the job search list was presented today, the Board terminates the disentitlement that day. The search list however lists contacts much prior to that date. If the job search is genuine, the disentitlement must be removed, not terminated. [p. 7]
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
existence of refusal |
|
|
| teaching |
availability for work |
summer months |
|
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not binding for future |
|
Decision 14090
Full Text of Decision 14090
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Summary:
The fact that the Board accepted the job search establishes that the claimant was available for and seeking work, not from 14-12, but from 17-11, the date the claim commenced. Obviously, employers listed not all contacted on the day of that letter of 14-12.
Decision 14071
Full Text of Decision 14071
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
effective date |
|
Summary:
Entitlement (based on adequate search for employment) does not take effect on the date when the proof is submitted, i.e. 1-10-86, but must be connected to the period when the searches were made (i.e. starting on 25-8-86).
