Decision 23243
Full Text of Decision 23243
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
ongoing requirement |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0652.93
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
good reasons |
|
| availability for work |
job search |
recall or other probable employment |
|
| teaching |
availability for work |
summer months |
|
| availability for work |
job search |
as a useless act |
|
Decision A-0652.93
Full Text of Decision A-0652.93
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
ongoing requirement |
|
Summary:
Availability is a statutory requirement pursuant to para. 14(a) and, hence, it cannot be ignored by Umpires, whatever the extenuating circumstances may be. That it may appear reasonable for a claimant not to seek work is insufficient reason to ignore the law.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
recall or other probable employment |
|
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
good reasons |
|
| teaching |
availability for work |
summer months |
|
| availability for work |
job search |
as a useless act |
|
Decision 14347
Full Text of Decision 14347
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
ongoing requirement |
|
Summary:
Claimant started a course on 29-9. The Board found that claimant was available from 27-11. Nothing of consequence happened on 27-11 other than receipt of explanations. What she proved on 27-11 was that she always had been available.
Decision 12712
Full Text of Decision 12712
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
ongoing requirement |
|
Summary:
The job searches took place in September, October and November. Thus, if the Board accepted them as evidence of a job search, it should have cancelled the disentitlement as of 29-9, not merely from the date of the hearing.
Decision 11036
Full Text of Decision 11036
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
ongoing requirement |
|
Summary:
Claimant's prior conduct for which he has already been disentitled is not determinative of his subsequent availability. While prior conduct may have some relevance on credibility, it cannot form the basis of indefinite disentitlement. Ongoing requirement.
