Decision 45899
Full Text of Decision 45899
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
immediate availability |
|
Summary:
Claimant asserted that, because he had chosen to be confined to a residential drug addiction treatment centre, he was not subject to par. 32(a) of the Act regarding inmates. Claim dismissed by the Umpire. Claimant was required to be at the residential drug addiction treatment centre 24 hours a day. The court order even stated that he would be taken into custody if he left the residential centre. Claimant was not in a position to look for work or hold any type of job. FCA decision in Whiffen (A-1472.92) cited.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
imprisonment |
|
Decision 21518
Full Text of Decision 21518
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
immediate availability |
|
Summary:
Would quit the course if she gets work in her profession. Could not expect such work until she passed the qualifying exams. As per CUB 9016, availability at some future date is not sufficient. Not eligible to practice medicine. All her efforts were directed to the future.
Decision 13106
Full Text of Decision 13106
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
immediate availability |
|
Summary:
Availability referred to by Act is not availability to obtain better employment but to find employment quickly; availability must be immediate and relate to every working day.
