Service Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

The Index of Jurisprudence

A Supplement to the Digest of Benefit Entitlement Principles

Decision A-0465.87

Case Number:
Claimant:
Judge:
 
Norris A. 
Federal 
 
Language:
Decision date:
 
English
1988/06/01
 

Decision:
Appealed:
Appellant:
Corresponding Case:
 
Dismissed Unanimous 
No
N/A 
 

Issue:
Sub-Issue 1:
Sub-Issue 2:
Sub-Issue 3:
 
basic concepts 
number of weeks required 
 

Summary:

Employed until 30-4-83. At that time, he bought the business and ceased paying UI for himself for 13 months. No week of insurable employment in the qualifying period. Upheld by FC.


Issue:
Sub-Issue 1:
Sub-Issue 2:
Sub-Issue 3:
 
antedate 
disentitlement period at issue 
employed 
 

Summary:

As per the Umpire, the intent is that a claimant with a good reason for delay will be able to collect benefits for a previous period of unemployment. Here the claimant is attempting to have his benefit period cover a period in which he was self-employed. Upheld by FC.


Issue:
Sub-Issue 1:
Sub-Issue 2:
Sub-Issue 3:
 
basic concepts 
qualifying period 
extension 
employed 
 

Summary:

Claimant says that it is unfair that other claimants, such as released prisoners, may have their qualifying periods extended but he may not on the ground of having been self-employed. Case dismissed by FC.