| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
own misconduct |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant lost his employment due to his misconduct. Also, that it cannot pay him benefits from March 25, 2009 to March 30, 2009 because he was in a prison and cannot pay sickness from March 25 and March 26, 2009 because he had not proven that he would be available for work if he were not sick. According to the employer, the claimant was dismissed because he was in violation of two conditions of his Last Chance Agreement with the company namely being incarcerated and unavailable for work. The claimant was absent with a doctor's note for March 25 and 26, he not available for work on March 29 and 30, could have returned to work on March 31, but he only contacted the employer on April 1st. The claimant’s appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
absences from work |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant lost his employment due to his misconduct. Also, that it cannot pay him benefits from March 25, 2009 to March 30, 2009 because he was in a prison and cannot pay sickness from March 25 and March 26, 2009 because he had not proven that he would be available for work if he were not sick. According to the employer, the claimant was dismissed because he was in violation of two conditions of his Last Chance Agreement with the company namely being incarcerated and unavailable for work. The claimant was absent with a doctor's note for March 25 and 26, he not available for work on March 29 and 30, could have returned to work on March 31, but he only contacted the employer on April 1st. The claimant’s appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
Not available and not otherwise available |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission determined that the claimant lost his employment due to his misconduct. Also, that it cannot pay him benefits from March 25, 2009 to March 30, 2009 because he was in a prison and cannot pay sickness from March 25 and March 26, 2009 because he had not proven that he would be available for work if he were not sick. According to the employer, the claimant was dismissed because he was in violation of two conditions of his Last Chance Agreement with the company namely being incarcerated and unavailable for work. The claimant was absent with a doctor's note for March 25 and 26, he was not available for work on March 29 and 30, he ould have returned to work on March 31, but he only contacted the employer on April 1st. The claimant’s appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
