| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
as a requirement |
|
Summary:
Claimant was a seasonal worker and argued that it was pointless to look for paid work for a short period, since no serious employer would be interested in training an employee who would be leaving so soon. It was concluded that availability must be proven for every working day in a set period and that this requirement could not be ignored, no matter what extenuating circumstances may prevent a worker from complying with it.
