| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
definition |
|
Summary:
The case law has clearly established that the concept of availability implies a sincere desire not only to make oneself available, but also, and above all, to make a serious effort to find a job. In the present case, it seems that a single job search does not meet the requirements of the above-noted criterion.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
as a requirement |
|
Summary:
The case law has clearly established that the concept of availability implies a sincere desire not only to make oneself available, but also, and above all, to make a serious effort to find a job. In the present case, it seems that a single job search does not meet the requirements of the above-noted criterion.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
proof |
|
Summary:
The case law has clearly established that the concept of availability implies a sincere desire not only to make oneself available, but also, and above all, to make a serious effort to find a job. In the present case, it seems that a single job search does not meet the requirements of the above-noted criterion.
