Decision 38432
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 38432 | Hollingworth | English | 1997-09-03 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returned to a different Board | No | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| week of unemployment | circumstances | time spent |
Summary:
Umpire stated that the Jouan case is not the "be all and end all" and the decision of Veilleux and Magee heard by different panels of the FCA indicate that the criteria laid down by Dubé J. in Schwenk are still to be considered when evidence conclusive of the time element is missing. It is therefore only when the time element is very consequential that the other facts need not be considered.