| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
principal means of livelihood |
|
|
Summary:
Although the Jouan decision related to a case of employment for 50 hours a week, the fact remains that 35 to 40 hours a week is a sizable number of hours to devote to a business. Consequently, it could not be said that the involvement in the business was so minor in extent that it could not be followed as a principal means of livelihood.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Summary:
Although the Jouan decision related to a case of employment for 50 hours a week, the fact remains that 35 to 40 hours a week is a sizable number of hours to devote to a business. Consequently, it could not be said that the involvement in the business was so minor in extent that it could not be followed as a principal means of livelihood.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
circumstances |
time spent |
|
Summary:
Although the Jouan decision related to a case of employment for 50 hours a week, the fact remains that 35 to 40 hours a week is a sizable number of hours to devote to a business. Consequently, it could not be said that the involvement in the business was so minor in extent that it could not be followed as a principal means of livelihood.
