| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| sickness benefits |
out of canada |
|
|
Summary:
Although it may be argued that the claimant by residing in a warm climate such as Panama was pursuing a medical treatment which is at least during the winter months not available in Canada, this treatment, did not occur in a hospital or similar institution. Given that the claimant does not fall within any of the exceptions to the general prohibition found in s.54 of the Reg.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| sickness benefits |
treatment not available in canada |
|
|
Summary:
Although it may be argued that the claimant by residing in a warm climate such as Panama was pursuing a medical treatment which is at least during the winter months not available in Canada, this treatment, did not occur in a hospital or similar institution. Given that the claimant does not fall within any of the exceptions to the general prohibition found in s.54 of the Reg.
