Decision 22907
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22907 | Rouleau | English | 1993-09-17 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| refusal of work | presently working |
Summary:
CEIC's argument: the jurisprudence has established that a refusal of permanent or full-time employment is without good cause when claimant only has occasional or part-time employment; this also applies to someone who has a choice between 2 jobs and chooses the one of shorter duration. CEIC appeal allowed.