Decision 19380
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 19380 | Cullen | English | 1991-04-18 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
availability for work | restrictions | part-time work | employed |
Summary:
Powerful inference from previous conduct and statements that he did not intend to be available for other work pending recall as sessional attendant, and that UI was used to supplement his income in the interim periods. Only available with the employer with whom he was on call.