Decision 17024
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 17024 | Strayer | English | 1989-09-25 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | restrictions | reasonable period of time |
Summary:
This is so no matter how good the motives for moving: the law in no way impairs the unification of families but one cannot receive UI for as long as one had remained more available by staying where more jobs were. 29 weeks is much in excess of reasonable time.