Decision 16668
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16668 | Reed | English | 1989-06-14 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | incompatible situations | leave requested |
Summary:
Non-availability based on a claimant's request to take leave of absence not upheld. There is conclusive proof that she was required to take pregnancy leave. The collective agreement stipulates that no female employee shall continue during and after the 6th month.