Decision 16277
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16277 | Teitelbaum | English | 1989-03-13 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| interruption of earnings | conditions required | rehired within 7 days |
Summary:
Claimant retired 31-12-85 and was paid for 1-1-86, a statutory holiday. He was subsequently asked to return to work 7-1-86 to train his successor. He did so. There is an interruption of earnings only if one did not work for 7 consecutive days. Here, there were only 6 days.