| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant argues that as a result of a 6-week disqualification for leaving work he ought to be entitled to UI once the disqualification ends. This would be acceptable if a second disqualification for attending a full-time course had not been imposed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
employment left |
|
Summary:
Claimant argues that as a result of a 6-week disqualification for leaving work he ought to be entitled to UI once the disqualification ends. This would be acceptable if a second disqualification for attending a full-time course had not been imposed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
pattern study-work not at same time |
|
Summary:
Left full-time work to attend a course. Says he previously worked part-time for 2 years but no indication he was also attending classes at that time. A statement of intention has to be supported by history of work and study combined over several years.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
part-time work |
employed |
Summary:
Full-time student who alleges he may earn up to 25% of weekly benefit and still get full amount of UI. While it is true a claimant may work part-time and still receive UI, this is applicable only to those claimants who are available on a full-time basis.
