| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
labour market information |
|
Summary:
The CEIC has not really satisfied the onus of proving that she was unavailable. Was her job search inadequate? What were the chances of obtaining work at those hours? It is not sufficient to obtain labour market information that claimant may be restricting her chances of work.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
as a requirement |
|
Summary:
The requirement is not only to show that one is available, but also what one has done to secure employment. Simply saying "I never refused any work" is not enough because it implies a requirement on the Commission to make job offers.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
constitution of board |
quorum |
|
Summary:
One Board member disqualified himself. One member agreed with the Commission and found claimant not entitled. One member found claimant entitled. "Majority decision" that claimant was not available is maintained.
