| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
applicability |
rationale |
|
Summary:
The social value evinced by UI is to put monetary benefits in the hands of involuntarily unemployed who remain willing and able to take suitable employment, without undue restrictions, as soon as possible so as to avoid unnecessarily taking money from fund.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
leave requested |
|
Summary:
From the point of view of the developmental needs of her child, claimant's decision to take an extended leave is objectively laudable. Employer ready to take her back after 17 weeks but she chose not so soon. Not in line with social value evinced by UI.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
casual or substitute |
applicability |
|
Summary:
Regular teacher who, while on leave, worked as substitute for the month of June and contended she came within 46.1(2)(b). The assertion is irrelevant because, during her qualifying period, she was a full-time teacher and not merely casual or substitute.
