| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| penalties |
courses of study |
|
|
Summary:
I am inclined to think that the no answer was false and claimant should have understood it to be false since the question is phrased so broadly. Nevertheless, the grounds stated in the notice referred to availability, not to attending a course.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
time required for studies |
|
Summary:
Reading class 22-5 to 21-6. Did not attend lectures but was given books to read, then had to write paper. Attended another course 31-7 to 20-8 which could be converted into reading class. The Board erred in fact. Job search was not the issue but the nature of the course was.
